Time (PH)lies (A)lways - (GE)


Wow, I can't believe it’s already almost the end of the semester! It’s literally so crazy. Even though so much has happened, both within 109 and my life, I feel like I just sat down for the first day of classes two days ago. While I know time flies, it still baffles me every time it keeps on doing it.

Anyways, enough of my reflections. So what does “Biological Engineering” mean to me? It means engineering biology ideally to solve problems somewhere down the line. I say somewhere down the line because sometimes research does not have immediate applications, but I believe somewhere down the line, it will help someone, the society, the environment, something.  

But what does it mean exactly to engineer biology? Well, throughout this class, we’ve seen a variety of ways to do so—through use of the CometChip for damaging DNA, CRISPR to edit DNA, and phage to make a battery. In my UROP, I engineer biology through trying to grow human-cells in 3D cultures for tissue engineering. There’s a variety of different ways to engineer biology and I am very thankful for this class that it exposed me to a few different methods. I am also thankful that I finally understand CRISPR and it’s crazy to think that I, just an undergrad, have used CRISPR to engineer biology. CRISPR always seemed like this far off thing, but it’s not like that anymore.

Moreover, it was awesome to think about ways that we could engineer biology ourselves through our research proposals. And we were really trying to engineer biology as much as possible, since we combined a couple different systems (organoids and the microbiome). Really stacking up on that engineering of biology :)

Lastly, just thank y’all once again for making this class very enjoyable and for having taught us so much.

~Ayşe Güvenilir



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It BE like that sometimes (R)

Image
The hardest part of scientific writing for me is a combination of a lot of different things. Finding the reason for the research that is not too broad (aka, cancer in general), but is also not too specific (glioblastoma, since, while our cells were from glioblastoma, we didn’t directly study this). The implications and future-works section was rough for similar reasons to the background and motivation, but it was slightly easier since it was based off of our own data. Also, compiling information to include in the background and motivation is really rough. I think making the figures and analysis was a little easier, though it was definitely very time consuming. It be like that sometimes I guess. I did enjoy making the figures in MATLAB though! Was a lot of fun for me. Something that really helped our team was making a to-do list of everything that needed to get done. I think this is something I will implement for writing my full research report for Module 2....
Read more

So Many Figures

            When we first chose our journal articles a couple weeks ago I tried to be intentional about picking one that would make a good presentation. I wanted one that I found interesting, and one that would have enough engaging results to fill the full 10 minutes. It was those two criteria that led me to choose the “Directing Cellular Information Flow via CRISPR Signal Conductors”. I found the premise of engineering CRISPR constructs to act at ‘Boolean Logic Gates’ really intriguing, but what I didn’t realize until somewhat later was just how extensive this paper was. Not only did the authors design environment inducible CRISPR sgRNAs they also created three or four variations of this system, tested its responsiveness to a number of different conditions, created six different ‘logic’ gates, and used them to kill cancer cells. In addition to the 6 figures in the paper, there were 36 supplementary figures and 24 supplementary ...
Read more

The difficult part of technical writing

Image
Technical writing is decently intuitive to me because it is typically divided into discrete sections: the abstract, introduction & background, materials & methods, results, and implications & future work. Excluding the abstract, each section logically leads into the next one without the need for elegant transitions, unlike creative writing. I typically like to write the introduction first, as it gives me a good idea of what the general goal of the paper is. It helps me to focus my methods section and the rest of the paper to only include material which is necessary for the goal of the study. I like to write the methods section after, as it reminds me of which experiments were important to the study and thus what data I should include in my results section. When I get to the results section, the introduction and methods have given me a good idea of what figures to make and what data to include. This leads me into writing the implications & fut...
Read more